Introduction
When you first glance at three workers harvesting Vespene gas from the relevant building it seems that there is absolutely no room for more. Therefore, some players took it for granted that this is the optimal amount required for gas collection. However, would using 4 workers increase productivity from one extractor? Even among the best StarCraft players there was uncertainty as to what the ideal worker saturation was on gas.
An experiment was required to find the optimal number of workers needed for the most efficient gas production and identify any dependence on the location or speed of the worker.

Method
A map was specifically designed that sets a timer for 60 seconds early in the game and ends the game after that set time. The basis for the experiment was the map Dire Straits, and it included a Hatchery and Extractor located in the usual places for this map and the usual 4 drones spawned at the same distance from the extractor.
Test 1: "3 workers on gas"
Once the game started, all 4 drones were selected by double-clicking and sent to the extractor. Immediately thereafter, one of the workers was removed to leave only 3 mining gas.
Test 2: "4 workers on gas"
Once the game started, all 4 drones were selected by a double-click and sent to the extractor.
These tests were then repeated several times in different map locations. A similar setup was used to test both Terran and Protoss as well. An alternative test using 5 workers was performed but quickly abandoned as it became clear that it yielded the same results as using 4 workers.

Results
Zerg
After repeated trials the outcome was esentially always similar. After 1 minute of collecting gas with 3 drones, 176 gas was accrued. 4 workers, however, yielded 200 gas.
One minute of gas harvesting.
| 3 Drones | 4 Drones |
| 176 gas | 200 gas |
Terran
The experiment was performed twice with the Terran, both at 7 o'clock and 5 o'clock, but the results were the same (as was the case with Zerg) so no other locations were analysed. For 1 minute of gas production from 3 workers 192 gas was harvested. The time of the experiment was increased from 1 to 2 minutes to further dissect the differences between 3 and 4 worker gas production. After 2 minutes 392 gas was provided by 3 workers while 4 workers brought 408 gas.
One minute of gas harvesting.
| 3 SCVs | 4 SCVs |
| 192 | 200 |
Protoss
Protoss was experimented with 4 times with 3 probes in the bottom left base, and the results were as follows: 168 and 176 gas in 1 minute. And from 4 probes at the bottom location: 192 gas. The experiment was repeated at the 5 o'clock location and surprisingly the 3 probes constantly accrued 160 gas after 1 minute, while 4 workers gave 192!
One minute of gas harvesting.
| 3 Probes | 4 Probes |
| 160, 168 or 176 | 200 |
Conclusion
In all cases, 4 workers collecting gas for 1 minute extracted more gas than 3. It appears that the probes idle in the assimilator a little longer than drones or SCVs as their less dependable results indicate, and in addition the orientation of the assimilator relative to the nexus may make a difference. The main thing that can be taken from this article is that four workers indeed collect gas faster than three!
Original translation (in Russian)
SaK
Editting
iCCup.deL (ENG)
iCCup.Rp (RUS)
Translation (in English)
iCCup.deL
iCCup.YelloAnt
Google Translator




#1
(Messages 23)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 16:59 local
#2
(Messages 7)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 17:00 local
#3
(Messages 119)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 17:05 local
#4
(Messages 2)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 17:16 local
#5
(Messages 81)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 17:18 local
#6
(Messages 625)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 18:14 local
It would be interesting to see a similar comparison with depleted gas geysers and with multiple bases mining with 4 drones.
#7
(Messages 36)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 17:19 local
#8
(Messages 260)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 17:19 local
#9
(Messages 2)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 18:02 local
#10
(Messages 2)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 18:03 local
#11
(Messages 1)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 19:22 local
#12
(Messages 625)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 20:36 local
#13
(Messages 3)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 00:58 local
#14
(Messages 54)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 17:24 local
maybe its true
#15
(Messages 1)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 19:02 local
#16
(Messages 1)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 20:11 local
Also what about placing the building by your gas to make the workers mine gas straighter. You should test that to see how much that effects it.
I doubt I'd ever go 4 drones. Early game I rather use that extra worker in the minerals :-/. Then by the time I really need gas I'd have expansions up anyways. If this is true and 4 produces more gas faster then I can see it being useful when your in a tight spot and need your gas ASAP, I guess :).
Still interesting nonetheless.
#17
(Messages 625)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 20:37 local
#18
(Messages 3)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 01:00 local
#19
(Messages 625)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 01:57 local
#20
(Messages 222)
l
28 Sep 2009 @ 22:29 local
#21
(Messages 126)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 00:56 local
#22
(Messages 3)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 02:11 local
on the top ?
all proleague maps gas is on top or left side because they r the most efficient places to have it
i can bet my ass that u guys tested this without thinking of this cause of the results
#23
(Messages 7)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 02:18 local
Exemple : Where the gaz is on below of the base, 4 is better than 3.
#24
(Messages 1)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 02:26 local
#25
(Messages 3)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 02:37 local
#26
(Messages 8)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 03:20 local
#27
(Messages 66)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 04:13 local
I remember when I did that test, the same! 6 years ago... :D
I think... mmmh you have to use 4 workers
#28
(Messages 1)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 04:32 local
In the experiment that I had seen before,
the result had changed greatly by the position
of the gas to the position of CC(Nexus, Hat).
There was a result that the amount of the gas
that was able to be collected by three changed greatly
by the position of the gas to the position of CC(Nexus, Hat).
#29
(Messages 71)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 05:29 local
#30
(Messages 260)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 05:53 local
#31
(Messages 19)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 06:27 local
#32
(Messages 260)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 07:58 local
Well I think your right that more data should be collected. But as far as being weak? No, i think this will possibly open up a bunch of new timings and maybe a couple new BO's. The only think poor about this was the map choice IMO. Try using more popular maps like Dest, Pyth, HBR, ect...
#33
(Messages 37)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 08:00 local
#34
(Messages 1)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 08:11 local
#35
(Messages 8)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 10:40 local
but forgot it and thought 3 drones in gas are best, because I seen it in most replays and strategy tutorials:)
#36
(Messages 1)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 10:04 local
and #33 u say 30 more gas per minute is not a big deal? clearly you dont play ZvZ
#37
(Messages 625)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 19:40 local
#38
(Messages 1)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 10:36 local
en.wikipedia.org
#39
(Messages 625)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 19:40 local
#40
(Messages 1)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 10:43 local
#41
(Messages 1)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 11:18 local
#42
(Messages 213)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 12:34 local
The only thing that should be surprising is T imba :S
#43
(Messages 260)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 13:37 local
#44
(Messages 1)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 12:39 local
#45
(Messages 44)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 12:54 local
#46
(Messages 2)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 13:24 local
i gonna put 4 pobres
#47
(Messages 63)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 14:04 local
#48
(Messages 63)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 14:05 local
#49
(Messages 1)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 14:28 local
www.teamliquid.net
And regarding the orientation of the geyser respectively to the the nex/cc/hatch:
www.teamliquid.net
#50
(Messages 1)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 15:17 local
#51
(Messages 9)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 15:17 local
#52
(Messages 2)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 15:24 local
#53
(Messages 11)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 18:53 local
There is a reason for that. All proleague maps are made so that the geyser is either on the top, or the right hand side. This is becuase of pathing issues. If you were using dire straits (how do you even know if the geyser is balanced for 3?), then you are bypassing the fact that all the maps played right now are more balanced. You should of conducted the experiment on a proleague map, not a map that blizzard made 10 years ago...
Gas mining has to do with positioning of the geyser to the CC/Hatch/Nex. It has been balanced so that 3 is the same as 4. There has been extensive testing on this. I personally find it really funny that people are saying "oh wow im gonna use 4 now" when the game is 11 years old, and has obviously been tested many many times in the past. None of this is new, nor very relavent. The article is fine, however it's touching on a subject that has been addressed and re-addressed over a dozen times in the past.
#54
(Messages 11)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 18:56 local
#55
(Messages 260)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 19:10 local
#56
(Messages 3)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 18:58 local
#57
(Messages 625)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 19:42 local
#58
(Messages 2)
l
29 Sep 2009 @ 22:52 local
#59
(Messages 5)
l
30 Sep 2009 @ 04:02 local
#60
(Messages 26)
l
30 Sep 2009 @ 06:14 local
#61
(Messages 3)
l
30 Sep 2009 @ 13:22 local
#62
(Messages 2)
l
30 Sep 2009 @ 23:38 local
-_-||| Is 5 bigger than 4?But why 5 workers dont get faster than 4......
#63
(Messages 2)
l
15 Feb @ 05:53 local
#64
(Messages 10)
l
10 Mar @ 09:19 local
#65
(Messages 10)
l
10 Mar @ 09:22 local